|
|
|
|
|
| Think you have what it takes to help judge the Stevie Awards for Sales & Customer Service? Apply to be a preliminary-round judge today. If you qualify, you'll be assigned categories based on your experience and industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
Company: MeadWestvaco Corporation, Richmond, VA. Entry Submitted By: Sales Resource Group Inc Company Description: MeadWestvaco Corporation is a diversified packaging company that manufactures cardboard packaging, plastics and chemicals used in a multitude of packaging, commercial and industrial applications. The company is a global sales organization that has its roots in the forestry resource industry. Nomination Category: Best Organization Achievements Nomination Sub Category: Sales Compensation Program of the Year
Nomination Title: MeadWestvaco Corporation
How many people are in your organization's entire sales department?
425
What is your organization's annual sales volume? If this information is confidential, simply enter "Confidential" in this space:
$6.8 billion
Provide a brief biography of the leader(s) of your sales organization (up to 100 words):
John Luke Jr. CEO of MeadWestvaco Corporation committed to the sales organization in September 2006 that the company would develop a world class sales compensation program to support a strategic shift from a product-focused approach to a customer centric sales methodology. He participated in setting the future vision for the program with a requirement that every plan must demonstrate measures and payouts reflecting value to the customer and profitability for the company. His support of the initiative, including a personal undertaking to review the final plan designs verified the sustained commitment of the executive office to the field sales force.
Describe for the judges your achievement in this category (up to 100 words):
MeadWestvaco evolved different sales compensation plans in all business units and over 15 different lines-of-business without consistency or relationship between different sales roles to a common sales compensation program that spanned the domestic operations of the corporation. The program was fully aligned to the business, had a common framework to ensure salespeople were treated fairly and equitably, but was customized for each group, providing managers with a “tool” to focus sales representative behavior and communicate what the organization valued and would pay them to deliver. This was done for over 200 salespeople, in 30+ sales roles, within six months.
Briefly describe the 3 keys to the success of your initiative (up to 100 words):
Keys to this initiative were: 1. A reliable process used across all sales groups’ ensured design uniformity and role comparability across sales groups. The process utilized all stakeholder input (sales, HR. finance, sales operations) including an interactive approach to create plan designs. 2. Active participation of sales management and field personnel in the design process. Integrating their feedback/needs as design considerations increased field buy-in to plan changes. 3. Implementation of a strategic initiative measure in ALL plans influenced and changed sales behavior. These initiatives measured both required quantitative financial (profit) measures and qualitative imperatives (solution selling, planning and partnership development).
List the 3 most important lessons your organization learned during this process (up to 100 word):
Lessons learned from the process included: 1. The importance of quality and format in sales transaction data became increasingly evident. Particularly, in organizational restructuring, when information is extracted from several legacy systems, accurate and reliable measurement is difficult but not insurmountable. 2. The value of technology as an enabler for the organization to effectively design, produce plan documents, manage plans, calculate incentives and report and communicate results. 3. Clear, open communication and transparency is critical in the program so people develop trust in the numbers and understand the actions, changes and the rationale for why they are necessary.
|
|
|